Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/22236
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni, Mukta
dc.contributor.authorBaldridge, David
dc.contributor.authorSwift, Michele
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-20T05:55:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-20T05:55:25Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2040-7149
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/22236-
dc.description.abstractThe provision of accommodation devices is said to aid organizational inclusion of employees with a disability. However, devices that are meant to enable might only partially facilitate productivity, independence, and social inclusion if these devices are not accepted by the user's workgroup. The authors outline a conceptual model of accommodation device acceptance through a sociomaterial lens to suggest conditions influencing workgroup device acceptance. To build the model, the authors draw upon the sociomateriality and disability literature to frame accommodation devices as experienced in ongoing interactions, representing the goals, feelings, and interpretations of specific workgroups. The authors also unpack attributes of devices—instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism—and propose how each of these can pattern social conduct to influence device acceptance. The authors then draw upon the disability literature to identify attributes of workgroups that can be expected to amplify or diminish the effect of device attributes on device acceptance in that workgroup. The conceptualization, which the authors illustrate with examples particular to visual impairment, presents implications for who and what serves as a gatekeeper to accommodation device acceptance and thereby workgroup inclusion. Prior research has focused on conditions under which devices are requested by users or made available by organizations, undergirded by the assumption that devices are well-specified once provided and that they operate relatively predictably when used in various workgroups. The authors focus instead on what happens after the device is provided and highlight the complex and dynamic interaction between an accommodation device and the workgroup, which influences device and user acceptance.
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing
dc.subjectAccommodation devices
dc.subjectDisability
dc.subjectSociomateriality
dc.titleConceptualizing disability accommodation device acceptance by workgroups through a sociomaterial lens
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/EDI-01-2022-0010
dc.pages285-299p.
dc.vol.noVol.42
dc.issue.noIss.2
dc.journal.nameEquality, Diversity and Inclusion
Appears in Collections:2020-2029 C
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.