Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/21513
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatibandla, Murali
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-09T06:15:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-09T06:15:04Z-
dc.date.issued2014-06-25
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/21513-
dc.description.abstractAn action can be corrupt either morally or legally or in both ways. Legally speaking, corruption is generally defined as ‘misuse of a public office for a private gain’. Public office refers legislature, executive, judiciary, bureaucracy and the police (Patibandla, 2013). The constitution broadly defines the rights and obligations of these public offices. Legislature enacts laws within the framework of the constitution. Implementation of the laws is done by the executive. Politicians and the bureaucracy and even judiciary could collude for discretionary implementation of laws under imperfection information. When the public offices misuse their rights and obligations to derive a private gain it results in corruption. The sources can be traced to scarcity, property rights and their enforcement, transaction costs, informational asymmetries and political position (Patibandla and Sanyal, 2009),
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Bangalore
dc.relationIndia’s natural resources and institutional corruption
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIIMB_PR_2014-15_006
dc.subjectCurruption
dc.subjectInstitutional corruption
dc.titleIndia’s natural resources and institutional corruption
dc.typeProject-IIMB
Appears in Collections:2014-2015
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.