Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/20650
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDe, Rahul
dc.contributor.authorSahu, Himansu
dc.contributor.authorBajpai, Vivek
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-15T11:00:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-15T11:00:04Z-
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/20650-
dc.description.abstractAs we mentioned above from our research that there is no perfect definition for open source vendor. All firms who support and provide support for open source software shouldn’t be called open source vendors. Only those firms who work with open source code and develop something like a customization or plug-in should be termed as open source vendor for example companies who are directly involved in fully open source development like RedHat, Ubuntu etc or companies who build customization on top of open source product like MacSync, Zestard etc. Open source community contribution is an important parameter. But that shouldn’t be the deciding parameter. While choosing the open source service/support provider we should use existing frameworks available for vendor evaluation and then if there are more than one firm, then we can see their contribution to open source community which enhances the expertise level.
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Bangalore
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPGP_CCS_P16_085
dc.subjectSoftware industry
dc.subjectInformation system
dc.subjectOpen source software
dc.subjectOpen source vendor
dc.subjectInformation technology
dc.titleRating of small and medium open source product and service firms
dc.typeCCS Project Report-PGP
dc.pages8p.
Appears in Collections:2016
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PGP_CCS_P16_085.pdf198.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.