Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/15331
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMiscione, Gianluca-
dc.contributor.authorPfeffer, Karin-
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorDe, Rahul-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T12:27:46Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-29T12:27:46Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/15331-
dc.description.abstractE-government initiatives tend to come charged with expectations of improving the performance of public administrations by reducing inequalities in public service provision. The studies presented here elaborate on implications and consequences of systems to handle citizen complaints and public feedback related to the services provided to and managed for the population of different cities. Two cases from India and one from Europe have been chosen to explore what kind of consequences such systems can have in different settings. All cases are researched with a mix of qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Although such systems come wrapped within the rhetoric of universalism and more equitable access, empirical data show that, by facilitating 'participation of the fittest', they get exploited more effectively by those who are better off, already. Therefore bureaucracy tends to become more dependent on the social environment.-
dc.subjectE-government-
dc.subjectParticipation-
dc.subjectReflexive authority-
dc.subjectE-grievance systems-
dc.titleOpenness may not mean democratization: E-grievance systems in their consequences-
dc.typePresentation-
dc.relation.conference14th N-AERUS/GISDECO Conference. 12-14 September, 2013, Enschede, The Netherlands-
Appears in Collections:2010-2019 P
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Rahul_NAERUS_2013.pdf907.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.