Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/13478
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoorthy, Vivek
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-20T14:37:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-20T14:37:28Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-30
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/13478-
dc.descriptionThe Indian Express, 30-01-2016
dc.description.abstractOdd-even policy took on pollution. Now address congestion. As an initial measure to tackle pollution, the odd-even rule was a great move. Considering that short-term bans have worked in Paris and Beijing, and that the experiment was explicitly temporary, much of the English media has been unfairly critical. One study that found cars account for little of Delhi’s pollution was repeatedly cited. But evidence on sources of pollution is generally not that reliable, as evident from the conflicting readings. Further, cars lead to more road building and more polluting road dust. Even if pollution can be tackled by cleaner fuels, that does not solve the perennial problem of congestion. Without restrictions, travel time just rises. According to a study done for Bangalore by the Consortium of Traffic Engineers and Safety Trainers, the average speed on specified routes dropped from 35 kmph in 2005 to 9.2 kmph in 2014. Read more at: https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/what-delhi-must-do-next/
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Indian Express [P] Ltd.
dc.subjectPollution
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectPollution control
dc.titleWhat Delhi must do next
dc.typeMagazine and Newspaper Article
dc.identifier.urlhttps://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/what-delhi-must-do-next/
dc.journal.nameThe Indian Express
Appears in Collections:2010-2019
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.