Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/13390
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sriram, M S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-15T14:58:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-15T14:58:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-03-21 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/13390 | - |
dc.description | LiveMint, 21-03-2015 | |
dc.description.abstract | If the bank is to be funded through non-budgetary support in the mechanism outlined by Jaitley, it is financially challenged from inception. The rural development ministry has been lobbying hard with the government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to promote a developmental financial institution (DFI) for re-financing the women’s self-help group (SHG) movement to dovetail with its flagship programme—the National Rural Livelihoods Mission. One of the unintended consequences of this lobbying was the setting up of Bharatiya Mahila Bank. However, the proposals to have a new refinance agency have been consistently shot down both by the finance ministry and RBI, possibly with good reason—why do we need to add a new institution, when existing institutions such as the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Nabard) can do the job?. Read more at: https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/ZrYk3jP5eoCrhSfo3Pi1LP/The-fine-print-of-Mudra-Bank.html | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | HT Media | |
dc.subject | Banking | |
dc.subject | Financial services | |
dc.subject | Indian economy | |
dc.subject | Mudra bank | |
dc.subject | NABARD | |
dc.subject | Union budget | |
dc.title | The fine print of Mudra Bank | |
dc.type | Magazine and Newspaper Article | |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/ZrYk3jP5eoCrhSfo3Pi1LP/The-fine-print-of-Mudra-Bank.html | |
dc.journal.name | LiveMint | |
Appears in Collections: | 2010-2019 |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.