1. IIMB-
  2. Faculty Publications
  3. Magazine / Newspaper Articles
  4. 2010-2019
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/12999
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRanganathan, V-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-06T15:09:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-06T15:09:21Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-03-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/12999-
dc.descriptionThe Economic Times, 03-03-2012-
dc.description.abstractThe 2G case illustrates how there is a different form of regulatory capture, this time the regulator being indebted to the master who appoints him. On January 10, 2008, the DoT sold licences with 2G spectrum at 2001 prices, realising about Rs 10,000 crore, ostensibly on a firstcome-first-served basis, but actually violating even this. There was a feeling that the government lost revenue, fortified by CAG that assigned a dramatic Rs 1.76 lakh crore number to it. Swan got the licence for Rs 1,347 crore, and sold 45% to Etisalat for Rs 4,200 crore, valuing the firm at around Rs 10,000 crore. These raised suspicions about corruption. Read more at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/trai-has-never-been-consistent-about-how-to-price-allocate-spectrum/articleshow/12117780.cms-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.publisherBennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd.-
dc.subjectTelecommunication-
dc.subjectSpectrum-
dc.subjectAuction-
dc.subjectTelecom sector-
dc.subject2G Spectrum-
dc.titleTRAI has never been consistent about how to price & allocate spectrum-
dc.typeMagazine and Newspaper Article-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/trai-has-never-been-consistent-about-how-to-price-allocate-spectrum/articleshow/12117780.cms-
dc.journal.nameThe Economic Times-
Appears in Collections:2010-2019
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.