Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/11720
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Munshi, Soumyanetra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-21T13:40:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-21T13:40:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1043-4062 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/11720 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents an alternative theoretical perspective on democratization. Various models of democratization have been proposed in the literature, like enfranchisement in response to threats of revolution, threats of war, and split of interests among elites. However, there seems to be instances of democratization that do not follow any of these patterns. For one, these theories rely on redistributive aspects of franchise extension. My model captures democratization arising out of an evenly-balanced partisan competition between political parties, large rents from office and a part of the enfranchised benefiting from extension of franchise. Hence I can explain instances of suffrage extension with little or no redistributive repercussions like women’s suffrage. My model also fits the democratization experiences of several countries like Sweden, Chile, and Italy. | |
dc.publisher | Springer | |
dc.subject | Democratization | |
dc.subject | Enfranchisement | |
dc.subject | Extension Of Suffrage | |
dc.subject | Women'S Suffrage | |
dc.title | Enfranchisement from a political perspective | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/S10602-010-9091-7 | |
dc.pages | 21-57p. | |
dc.vol.no | Vol.22 | - |
dc.issue.no | Iss.1 | - |
dc.journal.name | Constitutional Political Economy | |
Appears in Collections: | 2010-2019 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.