Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/11108
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMitra, Shabana
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T13:11:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-26T13:11:06Z-
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0303-8300
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/11108-
dc.description.abstractTrickle-down has been addressed, so far, using income-based measures of inequality and poverty. However concerns over the inequality in access to other dimensions important for quality of life remains. I revisit trickle-down using the Alkire and Foster (J Public Econ 95(7–8), 2011) class of measures to estimate multidimensional poverty in India. Using NSS data estimates are presented for the 16 major states and are compared to income-based measures. Adding dimensions in poverty measurement results in the reversal of several income-based conclusions about poverty across regions. The paper also finds that contrary to income-based findings, Muslims are less poor than Hindus under the multidimensional criteria.
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands
dc.subjectIndia
dc.subjectMultidimensional Poverty
dc.subjectUneven Growth
dc.titleRe-assessing trickle-down using a multidimensional criteria: the case of India
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/S11205-017-1568-6
dc.pages497-515p.
dc.vol.noVol.136-
dc.issue.noIss.2-
dc.journal.nameSocial Indicators Research
Appears in Collections:2010-2019
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.