Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/123456789/3949
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRamachandran, J-
dc.contributor.advisorMukherji, Sourav-
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, Gauraven_US
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Suchindraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-25T15:35:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-28T04:35:30Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-25T15:35:37Z
dc.date.available2019-05-28T04:35:30Z-
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.otherCCS_PGP_P5_018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/123456789/3949
dc.description.abstractIndian telecom markets have been one of the most scintillating success stories of the privatization era. From an abysmal telecom market with endless waiting time for a phone connection, today we have come to phone on demand with a tele density of 16 per 100 and a growth rate of 5% per month. The major driver for this growth has been policy initiative, which has driven down the cost of telecom services for the common man and has paved the way for breaking the compromise on mobility. The policy has not been free from flaws though and has led to multitude of infrastructures for the individual players. Another important driver for growth has been the competitive force in the market with 6 clear national level players emerging after several rounds of acquisitions. The following are still acquisition target; IDEA, Spice and Aircel. A new entrant may find it useful to acquire IDEA and then look at the other players as the M&A rules will allow these players to merge. The growth of the telecom industry has been characterized by the identification and then subsequent breaking of compromises. These have either been policy-led or competition-led. The compromises currently being forced upon the consumers include prohibitively high costs for the low-income citizens and limited network coverage with 80% of the population outside the reach of the network. Policy can encourage rapid network expansion by providing incentives to share infrastructure and lease capacity from Railtel. Support from the USO fund may be provided for this purpose. Reliance, as an operator, can break these compromises for its subscribers in three different spheres: (a) Better marketing and value-added services to hold on to and increase its higher value subscribers, (b) Introducing a new paradigm of “receive-only” phones so that lower-end consumers can join the network, and (c) Expanding the network in rural areas by a revolutionary scheme where there is retail participation by entrepreneurs as partners.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Bangaloreen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesContemporary Concerns Study;CCS.PGP.P5-018en_US
dc.titleBreaking compromises in the Indian telecom industry growing Reliance infocommen_US
dc.typeCCS Project Report-PGPen_US
Appears in Collections:2005
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
p5-018(e28473).pdf563.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.